tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post4886330522778478825..comments2024-03-21T09:01:08.175-07:00Comments on Physics with an edge: Why MiHsC is better than MoNDMike McCullochhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-22636640045462576692016-03-31T11:20:44.861-07:002016-03-31T11:20:44.861-07:00Thanks, just read it. The discs of satellite galax...Thanks, just read it. The discs of satellite galaxies are interesting, but the article is behind the times. MoND is an empirical theory needing an adjustable parameter to be set by hand (ad hoc) whereas MiHsC does the same job for galaxies without needing any adjustment and works for galaxy clusters too. The process suggested in the article needs dark matter to be added ad hoc and then some of it must enter a superfluid state. It is ad hoc upon ad hoc. Nevertheless, thanks - the observational anomaly itself will give me something to think about.Mike McCullochhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-10336721648735259652016-03-31T04:21:24.889-07:002016-03-31T04:21:24.889-07:00Perhaps another anomaly worth pushing through the ...Perhaps another anomaly worth pushing through the MiHsC model?<br /><br />https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23030670-300-how-a-galactic-smashup-could-force-a-rethink-of-gravitys-laws/<br />Nickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06734100340786146866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-4704699312483697742016-03-31T01:41:27.003-07:002016-03-31T01:41:27.003-07:00Hi Mike,
http://www.cadc-ccda.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.g...Hi Mike, <br /><br />http://www.cadc-ccda.hia-iha.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/community/courteau/www/courteau_help.html<br /><br />Is this dataset usable for MiHsC?<br /><br />Regards, <br /><br />AD<br /> Czekohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04231020181834141834noreply@blogger.com