tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post207017179389031171..comments2024-03-21T09:01:08.175-07:00Comments on Physics with an edge: Wide Binaries 3.0Mike McCullochhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-42065490413998936402019-06-07T11:58:45.709-07:002019-06-07T11:58:45.709-07:00"This could have a clean result of linearizin..."This could have a clean result of linearizing and discretizing the squared scalar that is *energy* into a more robust concept of relative informational content."...<br /><br />Something is eluding us since Wheler told it, 'it from bit'.<br /><br />Really, are many questions that relate universe and information.<br /><br />¿What made a true diference between an electron, and other?<br /><br />.......................................<br /><br />Mike, please, a question: ¿How big is a photon?.<br /><br />For years, every body, sayd E = h·v, and say no more.<br /><br />Thanks Mike.<br />Derk_73-11https://www.blogger.com/profile/12052785059563241942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-58112298535719421112019-06-07T11:50:51.802-07:002019-06-07T11:50:51.802-07:00Mike, nice work.
May be future should not agree, ...Mike, nice work.<br /><br />May be future should not agree, and new alegations to your work arise.<br /><br />But by the moment, 83 binary systems, agree, and, as you sayd, without need of 'special constants matched to the data'.<br /><br />Congratulations, just from me.<br /><br />(I am a 58 years old engineer that has seen to much).Derk_73-11https://www.blogger.com/profile/12052785059563241942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-59941500521137195732019-04-04T08:20:23.753-07:002019-04-04T08:20:23.753-07:00@Mike: A copy is on its way to me as, well. We can...@Mike: A copy is on its way to me as, well. We can book club it.Analytic Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14307179997233629815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-5536829869596238612019-04-04T02:37:09.762-07:002019-04-04T02:37:09.762-07:00Analytic_D: I have just ordered Kantor's book ...Analytic_D: I have just ordered Kantor's book from Amazon. Thanks.Mike McCullochhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-48114941645857341612019-04-03T15:43:18.619-07:002019-04-03T15:43:18.619-07:00@Alex_Zaretsky
I have advised Mike before to look...@Alex_Zaretsky<br /><br />I have advised Mike before to look into Frederick Kantor's work in information mechanics to help inform the formulation of a more general, more rigorous model.<br /><br />Kantor actually starts his major book out with a trivial example of a single photon in a Universe, with a wavelength of that maximum size, and says that this must inherently represent one bit of information. All you can know about that photon is that it exists, since its position naturally couldn't be defined any more than being in the Universe.<br /><br />So, I suspect the informational treatment of QI must do something very similar, using the horizon as the cutoff. This could have a clean result of linearizing and discretizing the squared scalar that is *energy* into a more robust concept of relative informational content.Analytic Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14307179997233629815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-3760016919252254542019-04-02T09:13:43.691-07:002019-04-02T09:13:43.691-07:00Anyone?
Could use some knowledgeable help HERE:
h...Anyone?<br />Could use some knowledgeable help HERE:<br /><br />https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=19/04/01/2127227Gaaarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16582368660795688095noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-65268767579501916132019-03-03T07:36:54.800-08:002019-03-03T07:36:54.800-08:00Hello Dr. McCulloch!
Thank you for the very inter...Hello Dr. McCulloch!<br /><br />Thank you for the very interesting and thought-provoking work! <br /><br />I'd be grateful if you find time to answer the questions below, as I believe the answers may be interesting to many layman readers of the blog.<br /><br />1) Two years ago you wrote a comment: <br /><br />"I'm getting ahead of myself here, but I would like to get rid of waves and particles and express everything as informational 'agents' which see horizons. I can show that horizon dynamics can be derived just from 'agents' interpreting the uncertainty principle in 3d. This is much cleaner than using Unruh radiation (but is just a different interpretation of quantised inertia - same outcome). I haven't published all this yet, but I made a start in my recent paper 'Quantised inertia from relativity and the uncertainty principle'.. "<br /><br />I was wondering whether you had any progress in the development of this "informational" interpretation of QI?<br /><br />2) Will you consider accepting patronage via means other than Paypal (before opening the account they ask all possible private information that I'm not eager to disclose to yet another corporation)? For example, Patreon or Stripe? Or maybe even cryptocurrency, such as Bitcoin?<br /><br />Best regards,<br />AZAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16996992323902637115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-55405965330254323122019-02-22T23:43:37.950-08:002019-02-22T23:43:37.950-08:00QI is the best theory for a sub-zero (a0) accelera...QI is the best theory for a sub-zero (a0) acceleration regime. This needs verification. There is far too much uncertainty in the Hubble Width. Once that is refined then QI is basically verifiable right? <br /><br />QI might be a simpler model and a tremendous improvement in our understanding. Why isn't this being done? Someone should adjust some funding somewhere. I can't see how a refinement of this importance is not prioritized. Surely someone is willing to test these ideas experimentally. Plausible tests can be done.QuizWhizhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10833482699619030773noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-66670444900890299822019-02-18T11:13:01.043-08:002019-02-18T11:13:01.043-08:00Glad to see no-parameter theories that match the d...Glad to see no-parameter theories that match the data. This is encouraging news.<br />Chahe Adourianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08242577606963629446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-20213391024319423252019-02-18T11:11:56.297-08:002019-02-18T11:11:56.297-08:00Glad to see no-parameter theories to explain orbit...Glad to see no-parameter theories to explain orbits. Chahe Adourianhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08242577606963629446noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-18172289739951328832019-02-13T23:24:32.428-08:002019-02-13T23:24:32.428-08:00Hi Rocket Scientist,
I agree with you there. The ...Hi Rocket Scientist,<br /><br />I agree with you there. The point being that both MoND and QI need to correctly factor in the EFE. I agree with you that it should be the vector sum of accelerations. I am led to believe that Mike has been factoring the scalar sum of the accelerations, which makes no sense to me at all. This changes everything when we think about the physics within the cores of these stellar bodies as well. I am sure that the big jump in measured relative velocities is that some of the acceleration is cancelling out with the galactic acceleration, collapsing inertia. It is somewhat related to selection bias, because such an aberrant velocity makes the connectedness as a binary most obvious. Of the widest binaries, high velocities counter to prevailing rotation around galactic centre outs them as binaries.Marco Parigihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00702055111711651319noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-11053583878153653302019-02-12T17:12:55.940-08:002019-02-12T17:12:55.940-08:00Being in the Milky Way, the only way to get rid of...Being in the Milky Way, the only way to get rid of the Galactic Acceleration in the neighborhood of Earth is to find a wide binary where the acceleration of one of the stars is equal and opposite to the Galactic Acceleration. One star at near zero acceleration, the other at 2 * Galactic Acceleration. Maybe look for wide binaries that are 1/4 of a "Milky Way" Revolution in front of or behind Earth would give the best geometry. At near zero acceleration is where your QI model would get interesting. Rocket Scientisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02291269742000558359noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-51616505352397859112019-02-12T01:24:25.391-08:002019-02-12T01:24:25.391-08:00It isn't a bug, the page is on a blocklist. Th...It isn't a bug, the page is on a blocklist. The page you listed gives the following error when this blog is entered into the debugger:<br /><br />'We can't review this website because the content doesn't meet our Community Standards. If you think this is a mistake, please let us know.'<br /><br />I did the 'let us know' step though it has not helped yet. Kieran Lattyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08647811762309517077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-23035853642151697132019-02-11T11:18:18.616-08:002019-02-11T11:18:18.616-08:00It happened recently to a friend who publish again...It happened recently to a friend who publish agains wind turbines<br />https://twitter.com/rioujeanpierre<br /><br />I advised him to follow the procedure told ther<br />https://www.facebook.com/help/community/question/?id=10151472724566829<br /><br />No idea what he did, but it worked.<br />maybe you can find on the facebook page, or else ask JeanPierreAlain_Cohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08352476615242858677noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-18769563630988024812019-02-11T05:06:10.707-08:002019-02-11T05:06:10.707-08:00I am sad to report that Facebook is classifying th...I am sad to report that Facebook is classifying this post as 'against community standards' and blocking it. Kieran Lattyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08647811762309517077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-16911265011878336122019-02-10T19:18:06.038-08:002019-02-10T19:18:06.038-08:00Very interesting!
This is getting exciting. :)Very interesting!<br /><br />This is getting exciting. :)Gaaarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16582368660795688095noreply@blogger.com