tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post5761105102223152164..comments2024-03-21T09:01:08.175-07:00Comments on Physics with an edge: Halton Arp vs the Big BangMike McCullochhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-63737581978551631072019-06-30T13:49:57.316-07:002019-06-30T13:49:57.316-07:00Fascinating and heady stuff Sir. Your theory of QI...Fascinating and heady stuff Sir. Your theory of QI seems to have merit and the flaxen haired one approves. I will peruse your pontifications at length and comment accordingly. I'm not a fan of dark matter either. Mayhap, your theory is what is required to spin physics on its axis? I run a modest blog which sometimes touches on cosmology- not in an academic erudite way as I'm not a physicist but a retired geneticist (flaxensaxonblogspot.com). I try to present the topic in an easy going introductory manner aimed at the curious layman. I'm sure you are considered a maverick in your field: good for you and keep up your good work. I shall return. Flaxen Saxon. Flaxen Saxonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03431645401478120921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-2326704965897341962019-06-21T20:07:14.274-07:002019-06-21T20:07:14.274-07:00Have the new particles created in particle acceler...Have the new particles created in particle accelerators like LHC red ahifted spectrum? Is there a way to test this theory in there?Robertohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03958964389026485400noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-25208993688640252392019-06-12T14:33:27.937-07:002019-06-12T14:33:27.937-07:00Mike, I have seen old post of you and your opinion...Mike, I have seen old post of you and your opinion about how physic changed after the dead of Richard P. Feynman.<br /><br />Mike, I am 58 years old, and have seen this change. <br /><br />May be you are one in 3 persons I know, that agree with me on this. No more.<br /><br />Well, other point.<br /><br />You QI, I think I understand it (At first). <br /><br />But it remember to me works done before, not taking the relativistic horizont , but yes, taking the Quantum Vacuum (The one who makes the force).<br /> <br />Bernard Haish, Alfonso reuda, and Puthoff, worked a lot (A lot), on this (For instance, their work of 1994. "Inertia as a zero-point-field Lorentz force".)<br /><br />Please Mike, ¿Did you know them?, ¿What is your opinion about their work (Almost ended without any acknowledge from the mainstream, years ago).<br /><br />You know I am very cautious, we must be, but I accept nature is the judge.<br /><br />Thanks Mike.Derk_73-11https://www.blogger.com/profile/12052785059563241942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-30938821583099742252019-06-10T08:25:22.529-07:002019-06-10T08:25:22.529-07:00Hi Mike: Back before digital media I used to carry...Hi Mike: Back before digital media I used to carry a copy of (F. Hoyle; J. V. Narlikar (1964). "A New Theory of Gravitation" (PDF). Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 282 (1389): 191–207. http://ayuba.fr/mach_effect/hoyle-narlikar1964.pdf) in my brief case, just in case I needed to look at it. Great Paper.. Now it's your book "Physics From The Edge" that I seem to be packing around with me everywhere... My wife might have mentioned something about the psychology of security blankets?? <br />George Soli<br /> George Solihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08222067039714336167noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-23972695771379027262019-05-24T18:10:04.414-07:002019-05-24T18:10:04.414-07:00In 1999, this galaxy and their quasars, where trac...In 1999, this galaxy and their quasars, where tracked, and sow a correlation between the red-shift, and the angular distance to the minor axis of the galaxy.<br /><br />It was this work: https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9712021<br /><br />Well Mike, the fact is that Huble was able to measure his correlation between red-shift, and distance, trough the 'cefeidas' (coming from Delta Cephei, measured in 1784).<br /><br />It was not espected, just come out from the know of the cepheides.<br /><br />The same way as the Ia Supernova, other candels for bigger distances.<br /><br />They saw us the aceleration of the expansio.<br /><br />It was, neither, expected.<br /><br />Mike, red-shift colud come from diferent causes, and those of NGC3516 could be not from radial velocity.<br /><br />Like the 'quantized' red-shift (I have read him), !! is absolutly shocking ¡¡.<br /><br />But the correlation between red-shift, and distance, is real, whatever it is from.<br /><br />I do not like dark mater, dark energy, and so on.<br /><br />If 96% of mass of universe is NOT barionic, then ¿Why we, in our solar system, could not sense its influence?.<br /><br />Science is not an easy way, we always have to take look at 360º around us.<br /><br />Best regards.Derk_73-11https://www.blogger.com/profile/12052785059563241942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-69516130863082981772019-05-24T03:14:28.329-07:002019-05-24T03:14:28.329-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Derk_73-11https://www.blogger.com/profile/12052785059563241942noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-49712621970047448612019-05-23T03:19:23.816-07:002019-05-23T03:19:23.816-07:00I bought the book too, it's fun. Keep up the ...I bought the book too, it's fun. Keep up the good work. I never did like the modern phlogiston that is dark matter.Mark In Mayennehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14987723233401368368noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-45097226498352805972019-05-19T04:29:40.226-07:002019-05-19T04:29:40.226-07:00"Of course, Arp's observations enjoyed ab..."Of course, Arp's observations enjoyed about the same popularity in astrophysics as Galileo did in his tour of the Vatican"<br /><br />I suggest that you stay away from historical parallels involving Galileo. There is a lot of bad history of science out there from people who should know better. Take a look at Thony Christie's blog where he regularly eviscerates them. See for example:<br /><br />https://thonyc.wordpress.com/2018/04/04/getting-galileo-wrong-yet-again/<br /><br /> Laurence Coxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12022978799028708943noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-13519135050572623672019-05-15T04:01:22.037-07:002019-05-15T04:01:22.037-07:00http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1537231/1/Guiterrez_nat...http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1537231/1/Guiterrez_nature21040.pdfJack Bradshawhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07344024852380536727noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-58246230402885063112019-05-14T04:01:56.728-07:002019-05-14T04:01:56.728-07:00Hoyle and Narlikar had to introduce "creation...Hoyle and Narlikar had to introduce "creation fields" to make their theory steady-state (creation of matter ex nihilo from multiple "mini-bangs" at the center of quasars). This also requires some "negative energy" inside those quasars, for energy conservation. Without the C-field, the HN theory is no longer steady state (expanding universe, compatible with the Big Bang model). Therefore, if you suppose a steady state universe too, does QI require such C-field?Julienhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06498085495224042768noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-52333136973214227652019-05-13T17:41:27.260-07:002019-05-13T17:41:27.260-07:00Pieces of the puzzle falling into place! Nice!
I&...Pieces of the puzzle falling into place! Nice!<br /><br />I'm not a physicist, but am following along well enough. Keep it up: dark matter drives me nuts, lol.<br /><br />Thanks for the blog entry.Gaaarkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16582368660795688095noreply@blogger.com