tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post7502522720959239291..comments2024-03-21T09:01:08.175-07:00Comments on Physics with an edge: The Pull of the Distant HorizonMike McCullochhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-77694726410086943482016-09-28T01:13:14.635-07:002016-09-28T01:13:14.635-07:00The Hubble horizon will get larger with time (towa...The Hubble horizon will get larger with time (towards the future). Your comments are correct if you are talking about backward time. In the distance past the ratio mi/mg will be lower, and 2c^2/Theta will be larger so MiHsC/QI predicts inflation.Mike McCullochhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-60849870187959091502016-09-27T06:36:38.492-07:002016-09-27T06:36:38.492-07:00Question - Hubble horizon will get smaller over ti...Question - Hubble horizon will get smaller over time (the Universe expansion ratio is increasing). How will this affect MiHsC? Looks like over time difference between inertia and mass will be more and more profound? Does it mean galaxies will collapse into black holes much faster than we expect? Marek Cyziohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09583665404631297489noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-57781398268943339632016-09-04T06:26:05.952-07:002016-09-04T06:26:05.952-07:00I think I follow. It seems like the light wouldn&...I think I follow. It seems like the light wouldn't be bent all the way around back to you unless you had the most extreme accelerations (gravity levels). Maybe you just mean that it would bend away from where you attempt to send it preventing you from getting the information that you would have gotten without accelerating (creating a horizon for that information).Jack Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08909190645529256750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-52288722480082135482016-09-03T07:30:51.890-07:002016-09-03T07:30:51.890-07:00Jack: It is difficult to explain clearly, but here...Jack: It is difficult to explain clearly, but here's an easier way to think about it using the equivalence principle (which is valid in MiHsC/QI for normal to large accelerations). Instead of accelerating rightwards you can just as well say you're in the gravity field of a mass to your right. You send a light beam to your left to get information and the gravity field bends it back to you so you can't probe beyond a certain distance (this is now your information horizon). The bigger the mass (or the more your acceleration to the right is) then the more space bends and the lesser distance the light probe can go before it comes back, so the nearer the information/Rindler horizon is.Mike McCullochhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00985573443686082382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-86280658385348521082016-09-01T08:54:45.471-07:002016-09-01T08:54:45.471-07:00To further clarify, if someone was hand delivering...To further clarify, if someone was hand delivering information to, you could out distance them, but you could never outdistance information being transmitted at c that is within your information horizon.Jack Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08909190645529256750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-64907121970093244822016-09-01T08:51:26.896-07:002016-09-01T08:51:26.896-07:00Dear Dr. McCulloch,
You wrote: "If you accel...Dear Dr. McCulloch,<br /><br />You wrote: "If you accelerate away from a region of space fast enough it means that information there suddenly cannot get to you and an information horizon forms cutting it off."<br /><br />I was just thinking about this, and wonder if this might be incorrect or maybe I misunderstand. Imagine that information from the information horizon is being transmitted to you by light. If you try to accelerate away from that light, it seems like the distance between you and your information horizon would stretch behind you during the acceleration. This is because of the constancy of the speed of light. Am I missing something?Jack Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08909190645529256750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-60927353507874812222016-06-23T14:22:33.431-07:002016-06-23T14:22:33.431-07:00Now this is fascinating - it appeared just yesterd...Now this is fascinating - it appeared just yesterday:<br /><br />http://www.nature.com/articles/srep28263qraalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13436948899560519608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-75171929796123913772016-06-23T14:19:06.688-07:002016-06-23T14:19:06.688-07:00Larry Reed has a paper on Academia.edu which seems...Larry Reed has a paper on Academia.edu which seems to have a similar physical basis.<br /><br />https://www.academia.edu/11093756/Confinement_of_Light_Standing_Wave_Transformations_in_a_Phase-Locked_Resonator<br /><br />And that Wireless World essay is here:<br /><br />http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Journal%20Reprints-Quantum%20Theory%20/%20Particle%20Physics/Download/3309qraalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13436948899560519608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-8152145507283138742016-06-23T14:13:40.974-07:002016-06-23T14:13:40.974-07:00FYI Jennison's basic model can be found here: ...FYI Jennison's basic model can be found here: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/11/8/013/meta;jsessionid=5784B1F599B2AE7FB0A62B6E4D9DD89D.c2.iopscience.cld.iop.orgqraalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13436948899560519608noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-48287937209972143472016-06-23T00:54:35.885-07:002016-06-23T00:54:35.885-07:00The rigorous details of such a sheltering model fo...The rigorous details of such a sheltering model for gravity are elusive, but the concept is intuitive. <br /><br />A thought I'd had about it is that Unruh waves don't really transmit any information, being a quantum effect, and so it might make sense to treat it as a sort of revealed standing wave, based upon the observers acceleration. Except since particles are non-unique, their unruh radiation is interfered with by other similar particles in a probabilistic/quantum way per pair. Closer pairs block more waves. Count_M1 * Count_M2 * Scaling_factor / R^2. Looks just like gravity.<br /><br />Analytic Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14307179997233629815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-80359489545427932042016-06-21T09:54:44.071-07:002016-06-21T09:54:44.071-07:00Good and informative description of MiHsC for thos...Good and informative description of MiHsC for those of us without a physics degree. <br /><br />I'm also intrigued by the idea of gravity as the mutual "shadow" of massive bodies eclipsing some uniform background field.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03834647512480511000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4637778157419388168.post-76535914901035671222016-06-20T19:28:15.096-07:002016-06-20T19:28:15.096-07:00I thought you might find this interesting - Can no...I thought you might find this interesting - Can not add Pdf so you will have to search for the articles.<br /><br />What is an electron?<br />A new model: the phase-locked cavity<br />by R. C.Jennison, B.Sc., Ph.D., F.I.E.E., F.R.A.S., F. Inst.P., F,R.S.A.<br />Electronics Laboratories, University of Kent at Canterbury<br />In: WIRELESS WORLD. JUNE 1979 Page 42-47<br /><br />On the fundamental properties of matter<br />By R.C. JENNISON<br />Electronics Laboratories, The University of Kent in Canterbury, England.Michael Fidlerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05888554022000440043noreply@blogger.com